In Somalia, democracy cannot thrive without the protection of media freedom. The National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) warns that unless attacks on journalists and suppression of information are addressed, democratic progress remains shallow. This article examines the evidence, legal obstacles, and possible remedies.
Background on Media Freedom in Somalia
Somalia has a long history of conflict, political instability, and weak institutional structures. Within this environment, journalists often face threats from both non-state actors like militant groups and state actors such as security forces. According to a mid-2025 report by NUSOJ, there were 59 documented instances of attacks on media freedom in the country. These include arbitrary detention, harassment, and physical violence. Media Freedom, as defined under Somalia’s Provisional Constitution (Article 18), includes all forms of electronic, broadcast, and print media. [NUSOJ Report]
Recent Violations and Trends
Recent data shows a sharp rise in abuses. In the first half of 2025 alone, NUSOJ documented 41 violations tied to journalistic work, a record high in the past three years. Violations include threats, unlawful arrests, physical assaults, and interference with reporting. Many journalists in Mogadishu were targeted; security forces and intelligence agencies are frequently involved. Such actions erode public trust and induce self-censorship, undermining Media Freedom.
Legal Framework: Laws and Their Misuse
Somalia’s legal environment includes the 1964 Penal Code and the Anti-Terrorism Law among others. Many of these contain vague or overly broad provisions that criminalise speech, defamation, insulting officials, or “propagating terrorist ideas.” These laws are often applied to journalists for public interest reporting. NUSOJ has submitted a legal application to the Supreme Court seeking decriminalisation of journalism and reform of these laws. [Source]
Constitution vs Practice
The Provisional Constitution guarantees freedom of expression and media freedom. However, in practice, constitutional protections clash with legal codes and government enforcement. Security forces, courts, and administrative directives regularly violate rights promised in law. Journalists report that recordings are deleted, stories suppressed, and legal threats issued.
Impact on Democracy
Media Freedom plays a critical role in democratic governance. It enables transparency, accountability, and informed public participation. When media is silenced or intimidated, citizens lose access to vital information and cannot engage in meaningful discourse. In Somalia, widespread attacks threaten the ability of citizens to hold leaders accountable.
Right to Information and Public Oversight
Public oversight requires that citizens know what their government is doing. Without free reporting, corruption, human rights abuses, and misuse of power may go unchecked. NUSOJ’s reports show that many violations involve suppression of investigative journalism or critical reporting. These acts are harmful to Media Freedom and thus harmful to democracy.
Challenges and Barriers to Media Freedom
Several major impediments hamper Media Freedom in Somalia:
- Legal ambiguity: Vague laws allow arbitrary interpretation.
- Physical threats: Journalists face assault, detention, harassment.
- State actor involvement: Security services are frequent perpetrators.
- Self‑censorship: Fear of legal or physical reprisal leads journalists to avoid sensitive topics.
- Lack of judicial accountability: Laws are enforced inconsistently; violent acts against media workers often go unpunished.
Non-State Actors, Conflict Zones, and Media Freedom
Beyond state repression, conflict zones pose acute dangers. Militants like Al-Shabaab have targeted journalists. In areas where government control is weak, violence and intimidation are more frequent. Journalists in rural or contested areas face higher risk, which negatively impacts Media Freedom.
Recommendations for Strengthening Media Freedom
To restore Media Freedom and support democracy in Somalia, multiple actors must act:
- Legal reform: Repeal or revise Penal Code and anti-terror laws to protect journalism and ensure legal certainty.
- Judicial oversight: Supreme Court must clarify misuse of laws against journalists.
- Protection mechanisms: Safety protocols for journalists, both physical and legal; protection from threats.
- Accountability: Prosecute those who commit crimes against media workers; ensure reparations and justice.
- Support independent media: Funding, training, infrastructure to allow media outlets to operate freely.
- Ensure right to information laws: Make access to information a functional and enforceable right.
Case Studies
Examples highlight how lack of Media Freedom manifests:
- In Mogadishu in early 2025, journalists covering corruption and political dissent were detained without due process.
- In Somaliland, regional authorities restricted reporting and banned a media house outright.
- Throughout 2024, NUSOJ recorded 25 serious violations including unlawful arrests, torture, and censorship.
Conclusion
Democracy in Somalia is at a crossroads. Media Freedom is not optional it is foundational. Without it, democratic institutions weaken, public oversight fails, and trust erodes. Evidence from recent NUSOJ reports shows widespread violations that threaten Somalia’s democratic transition. Legal reform, accountability, protection for journalists, and stronger enforcement of constitutional rights are essential. Only then can Somalia move forward with a media environment that supports democracy rather than undermines it.
For more news click here.